Tutorial 10: From Prototype to Product
- Contributor
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read
LLM demos are easy. Production is hard. The leap requires quality, reliability, and discipline.
Step 1: The Gap (15 min)
Demo:
One happy-path query
One model
One user (you)
Production:
Thousands of edge-case queries
Mix of models / fallbacks
Many users
Adversarial input
Real cost
Compliance
SLAs
The gap is large.
Step 2: Quality Bar (15 min)
Define:
What's correct?
What's the acceptable error rate?
What's safe vs unsafe?
For example: customer support bot:
95% accuracy on FAQs
0% hallucinations on prices / policies
99% appropriate tone
Concrete bars > "good quality."
Step 3: Eval Discipline (15 min)
(Tutorial 6.)
Continuous eval:
Test set growth
Pre-deploy gates
Production sampling
User feedback integration
Without: cannot ship safely.
Step 4: Failure Modes (15 min)
Handle:
LLM provider down
Rate limited
Invalid output
Hallucinated facts
Off-topic responses
Inappropriate content
Each: a code path.
try:
result = call_llm(...)
if not valid(result):
return fallback_response()
except RateLimit:
return cached_response() or "try again later"
Step 5: Rollout Strategy (15 min)
Don't ship 100% day one:
1% internal users
10% beta
50% gradual rollout
100% with rollback ready
Watch metrics; SLOs.
Feature flag based:
if flag('new-llm-flow', user): return new_flow(...)
return old_flow(...)
Step 6: Human in Loop (15 min)
For high-stakes:
Suggestions to humans (copilot)
Confidence threshold; route low to human
Pre-publish review
"Tools for humans" > "fully autonomous"
For most apps: hybrid better.
Step 7: Cost Discipline (15 min)
Set per-user / per-tenant budgets.
if monthly_usage[user] > BUDGET:
return "Out of allowance"
Without limits: one user can burn $$$.
Especially: prompt injection or runaway agents.
Step 8: Privacy + Compliance (15 min)
LLM calls = data leaving your infra (to OpenAI etc.).
PII redaction before sending
BAA with provider for healthcare
EU data residency (Azure OpenAI EU; private GPT)
DPA with provider
Customer consent
(Path 76 covered compliance.)
Step 9: Continuous Improvement (15 min)
Production app lifecycle:
Eval set grows from real failures
Prompts refined
Models swap (newer / cheaper)
New patterns added
Retrieval improved
Weekly / monthly cadence.
Tools (LangSmith / Braintrust) make iteration faster.
Step 10: Realistic Expectations (15 min)
LLM apps are products, not magic
Some queries always wrong
Communicate uncertainty to users
Plan for "this is wrong" feedback flow
Be honest in marketing
Over-promising erodes trust faster than weak features.
Under-promise; over-deliver.
What You Just Did
Prototype to product: the gap, quality bar, eval discipline, failure modes, rollout, human in loop, cost discipline, privacy, continuous improvement, expectations.
You're Done With Path 79
LLM apps: shapes, prompts, structured outputs, RAG, agents, evals, cost/latency, injection defenses, observability, production. LLM application engineering.
Common Failure Modes
Ship demo as product. Quality cliff.
No fallbacks. Provider down = product down.
No cost caps. Surprise bills.
Hype-driven marketing. Disappointed users.
No iteration after launch. Drift.


